Hello Mr. Russell
I’m writing you so I can address a few recent executive orders in my current resident Florida. The government forced people to evacuate from their homes and citizens were denied the right to bring legally owned firearms to storm shelters. I would like to start by stating that the rights aren’t always absolute, set a limit on where to call actions taken by the government dictatorial and separate those that are justified. The Constitution of The United States safeguards are not in place to limit individual rights, but to protect those rights of the people. The limit individual rights put in place to protect all the people. It’s all about comprehening the intentions the founders had when writing the Bill of Rights that in today society are invading and failing to respect people's rights.
Recently your officers and agent have come to the city of Lauderdale Lakes and forced people out of their homes against their will, Stating it was for their own safety. I’m sure you are recognized with the 4th amendment and you would notice this is a immense violation of the people’s rights. Yes, there might have been a handful of houses that was deluge but that doesn’t justify them for telling people that it’s mandatory for them to leave their homes. Even if there was peril near you can’t force anyone to leave their homes, you can notify them and recommend for them to leave their homes but you can’t compel them to leave their houses
Firearms serve an important part in American society. Another problem the people of Lauderdale Lakes are dealing with is the agents won’t authorize legally owned firearms inside of the storm shelters. If a person own a firearms legally this is a violation of their constitutional right. The 2th amendment explains that people have the right to be arm and protect yourself. Florida law required for a background check to purchase a firearm. They keep governments under control and they ward off some other citizens with hostile intentions. Majority of people are good, some are bad. A person who legally holds a firearm should be allowed, by all means, to protect him or herself at any time in any place.
Sincerely,
Charmaine Rose
No comments:
Post a Comment